Personal Testimony as Evidence of God's Existence (Repeat Event)

THIS IS A REPEAT OF THE MAY 23RD EVENT TO ACCOMMODATE OVERFLOW The design or fine-tuning argument is a popular argument to prove God's existence. A less common one is from personal testimony. This purely subjective evidence carries emotional weight, but its validity is strictly limited and open to critique. Conversion experience lacks objective proof. Testimony shows that belief can change a life, but it cannot prove that metaphysical claims are universal. Moving testimonies of transformation appear in Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, and secular movements. These belief systems mutually exclude one another, so subjective experience cannot dictate objective truth. Social and narrative conformity adds another layer. Studies show that people often reshape stories to match "testimony lingo" to gain social acceptance in religious communities. Testimonies by famous prisoners are sometimes ridiculed as weak attempts at forgiveness for crimes. Despite these complications, do radical conversions carry any weight? Specifically, does the empirical reality of visible change—such as sudden recovery from addiction or a radical shift from hatred to altruism—constitute evidence that supports the existence of God, or does it merely reflect psychological or social factors?