
Building Agentic AI Projects for ML Image Classification: XGBoost vs. CNN.
Entrepreneur Collaborative Center · Tampa, FL
Date & Time
- Date
- Wednesday, November 4, 2026
- Time
- 5:30 PM EST
About this event
Everyone is building “AI agents” by wrapping a large language model around their code. We tried that too. We wired Claude agent in as the orchestrator of a medical image classification pipeline, tested it, and then deleted it. What replaced it works better for this job: a deterministic agent that runs the whole pipeline on its own. It works out its own plan. Nobody tells it the order of steps; it derives the order from what each skill needs and produces. It picks the right tool. When cached features exist for the exact same data, it reuses them instead of recomputing: a 157-second run drops to 77 seconds. It handles trouble on its own. It stops on bad data, retries a failed save, and refuses to promote a model that fails its quality gates. It logs its reasoning. Every decision is written down with the rule behind it. And every run, by every route, produces a byte-identical model. This talk walks through that project end to end: a five-class lung CT-patch classifier (normal, benign granuloma, adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, large cell carcinoma), built in Python with OpenCV, scikit-image and XGBoost. It reaches 96.67% test accuracy, 0.998 ROC-AUC and 0.958 MCC. Then we put it under pressure, with real numbers: Five ways to build the same pipeline: a plain script, an agent with skills, a LangGraph version with human approval, an LLM-orchestrated version and the final deterministic agent. Which ones were worth the code, and which were not? Deep learning vs. classic ML. A Keras CNN on identical images reached 93.17% after 33 minutes of training. XGBoost reached 96.67% in 10 seconds. Why the “old” method won. Can you skip labels? We tried six unsupervised clustering approaches (K-Means, hierarchical, DBSCAN, PCA, autoencoders, Gaussian mixtures). The best agreed with the diagnoses 87% of the time, but missed over a third of one cancer type. What clustering is actually good for in production. Real data hits back. On an open lung CT dataset, a…
Get more events like this
Free daily picks for live events around Tampa. No account needed.
Reminders arrive the day before, with our daily picks. Unsubscribe any time.


